Hamza Memon • Golf Prediction Studio

Build the round like a caddie call, not a plain form.

This redesign keeps the dropdown workflow you liked, but turns the experience into a cleaner course-briefing interface. Select the weather, run the Naive Bayes model in the browser, and get a stronger visual recommendation with confidence, signal breakdown, and a live summary of the selected playing conditions.

Course briefing

Pick the four conditions used in your dataset. The predictor updates as soon as the scenario is complete.

Local browser prediction
OutlookNot selected
TemperatureNot selected
HumidityNot selected
WindNot selected

Sky condition and general day tone.

How warm the conditions feel before tee-off.

Air moisture level used in the training data.

Mapped to the `WINDY` feature from your dataset.

Implementation note: this stays portable because the categorical Naive Bayes logic and the `play_golf` data are embedded directly in the page.

Round recommendation

The result area is designed to feel like a course-read panel, with one primary call and the reasons behind it.

Waiting for full scenario
-- Confidence

Complete the four inputs to generate the model confidence.

Prediction state

Ready when you are

Fill in the course conditions to see whether the model recommends playing golf or holding off.

Play golf --
--
Do not play --
--

Scenario read

No complete scenario selected yet.

Positive signals

  • The model will list supportive conditions here.

Risk signals

  • The model will list caution conditions here.

Confidence read

Once a scenario is complete, this section will explain how confident the model is in the recommendation.

Why this feels better

The form remains simple, but the hierarchy is stronger: one clear hero, one clear action area, and one clear prediction panel.

What changed

Instead of a basic card stack, the page now uses a scorecard-style left rail and a richer right-side recommendation layout with a confidence dial.

Next upgrade path

If you want the next version, I can connect this same UI to Flask or FastAPI so the browser calls your real Python model directly.

Benchmark shown from your notebook export: Naive Bayes `0.67` accuracy versus logistic regression `0.33` on the saved split.